KLC Law Reform Submissions

|
Kingsford Legal Centre is committed to engaging in systemic advocacy, including law reform, and to representing the interests of our clients and local community on social policy and administration of justice issues. We undertake this work in local, national and international forums. Law Reform is sometimes done in partnership with other community legal centres and with other organisations. KLC is an active member of both the national and NSW community legal centre law reform networks. Law reform work at KLC includes making submissions to government, parliamentary and other inquires in areas of law and policy directly relating to our clients. Below are links to law reform submissions made by KLC in the past few years. These documents are generally provided in PDF format. If you require these documents in another format for accessibility reasons, please contact us at legal@unsw.edu.au 2018Submission to Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesIn this joint Kingsford Legal Centre/Community Legal Centres NSW submission, we urge the government to:
Lodged: 21/6/18 Australian NGO Coalition Shadow Report on Australia’s Compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenThis report to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women examines Australia’s compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. The report focuses on key issues affecting our clients, including:
The report was coordinated by Kingsford Legal Centre, Community Legal Centres NSW, the National Association of Community Legal Centres and Good Shepherd Australia New Zealand. 15 NGOs contributed to the report, and 52 NGOs endorsed the report in whole or in part.
Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on MigrationDate Submitted: 4 May 2018KLC made submissions to the Joint Standing Committee’s inquiry into review processes associated with visa cancellations made on criminal grounds. KLC is concerned that current review processes for visa cancellations made on criminal grounds provide insufficient oversight of government decision making. KLC made a number of recommendations aimed at strengthening existing review processes to improve the efficiency and fairness of the section 501 visa cancellation process under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). KLC also recommended changes to the use of immigration detention in visa cancellation matters, including by ending mandatory immigration detention.
Submission to the Select Committee on the Future of Work and WorkersDate Submitted: 20 February 2018KLC lodged a submission with the Senate’s Select Committee on the Future of Work and Workers. Our submission focused on the impact of technological change on vulnerable workers in Australia. KLC has seen the emergence of client problems with work arranged through digital platforms in the passenger and food delivery industries. We have also observed that clients are experiencing problems when their access to electronic work records is withdrawn on the termination of employment. Drawing on our experience in employment law, KLC recommended that the Federal Parliament:
With respect to electronic work records, KLC also recommended that:
Submission to the Religious Freedom Review by Department of the Prime Minister and CabinetDate Submitted: 13 February 2018
2017Response to the Justice Project Issues Paper on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeopleDate Submitted: 4 October 2017Submission to the Justice Project Issues Paper on People with DisabilityDate Submitted: 6 October 2017Joint Submission on Australia's Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsDate Submitted: September 2017Review of Australia Fifth Periodic Report under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural RightsDate Submitted: 3 May 2017Submission to Inquiry into the Rates of Indigenous IncarcerationDate Submitted: 31 August 2017Submission to Inquiry into Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017Date Submitted: 27 March 2017KLC made a submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee’s Inquiry into Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017. KLC argued that section 18C strikes the appropriate balance between freedom of speech and freedom from racial vilification. KLC recommended the following:
Submission to the review of the Offence of Serious Vilification in NSWDate Submitted: 8 February 2017 KLC made a submission to the review of the offence of serious racial vilification under s20D of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977(NSW). The submission drew on KLC’s experience advising clients in our specialist discrimination law practice. In the submission, we argued for a number of changes to the offence to make it more effective as it has never been successfully prosecuted in NSW. We recommended that:
Submission to the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women's Country visit in AustraliaDate Submitted: 19 January 2017 KLC lodged a submission with the United Nation's Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women in response to a call for submissions providing information on violence against women in Australia. In the submission, KLC highlighted
2016Submission to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) review of rent models for social and affordable housingDate Submitted: 16 December 2016 KLC lodged a submission with the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) review of rent models for social and affordable housing. Drawing on our experience representing and advising social housing tenants, KLC recommended the following:
Submission in response to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights' Inquiry into Freedom of Speech in AustraliaDate Submitted: 12 December 2016 KLC made a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Right’s Inquiry into Freedom of Speech in Australia. In our submission, we argued that:
Letter toSenator Michaelia Cash regarding introduction of Paid Domestic/Family Violence leave provisions in Fair Work Act 2009Date Submitted: 31 October 2016KLC urges Senator Michaelia Cash, Minister for Employment and Minister for Women to reconsider her cancellation of a meeting with her State counterparts which would have provided an opportunity to discuss the introduction of paid Family/Domestic Violence leave provisions into the Fair Work Act 2009. Submission in response to NSW Department of Family and Community Services 'Foundations for Change - Homelessness in NSW' Discussion PaperDate Submitted: 13 October 2016 Submission made to: Homeless Strategy Team, Department of Family and Community Services KLC argues that the government needs to adopt a human rights approach to homelessness and focus on structural reasons for it, including poverty and the lack of affordable housing. Response to Discussion Paper on the Sharing of Intimate Images without ConsentDate Submitted: 21 October 2016 Submission made to: NSW Department of Justice KLC argues that the current laws do not sufficiently address 'revenge porn' issues and supports the introductio of new offences to specifically address the issue. Letter to the Hon. Brad Hazzard MP, Minister for Social Housing, regarding proposed Rental Bonds for public housing tenants.Date Submitted: 20 September 2016 Submission made to: the Hon. Brad Hazzard MP, Minister for Social Housing The NSW Government is considering the introduction of a rental bonds scheme for public housing tenants. KLC wrote to the minister responsible to voice concerns about the consultation process and the likely impact on tenants were the proposal to be introduced. Review of Australia Fifth Periodic Report under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Date Submitted: 30 August 2016 Submission made to: United National Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights In August Kingsford Legal Centre, working with the National Association of Community Legal Centres, has made a submission to the Review of Australia Fifth Periodic Report under the United Nations' International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The submissions highlighted the persistence of a significant gendered pay gap, and signalled the need to explore options to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with respect to the issue of self-determination. Review of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013Date Submitted: 29 July 2016 Submission made to: New South Wales Department of Justice In July Kingsford Legal Centre made a submission to the New South Wales Department of Justice regarding the review of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013. KLC's submission endorsed the recommendations made by Community Legal Centres NSW and put forward additional recommendations, including:
Stolen Generations inquiryDate submitted: 10 February 2015 Submission made to: New South Wales Legislative Council In February KLC was invited to give evidence at the inquiry being conducted by the NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee into reparations for the Stolen Generations in New South Wales. KLC ran the first litigation during the 1990s on behalf of Joy Williams, a member of the Stolen Generation. Joy’s case was not successful despite an application for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. Anna Cody, Kaleesha Morris and Kate Halliday gave evidence to the inquiry on 10 February 2016. Members of the committee asked some questions that KLC took on notice. KLC submitted a written submission as well as answers to the questions taken on notice in March 2016. KLC’s submission included the following recommendations:
Third Party Motor Vehicle Accident 'Green Slip' submissionDate Submitted: 27 April 2016 Submission made to: State Insurance Regulatory Authority Kingsford Legal Centre made a submission to the State Insurance Regulatory Authority for its review of the compulsory third party insurance scheme for people injured as a result of motor vehicle accidents. KLC argued for a move to a no fault scheme, and greater transparency around the cost of premiums for third party compulsory insurance (‘green slips’). 2015Willing to Work InquiryDate submitted: 4 December 2015 Submission made to: Australian Human Rights Commission Kingsford Legal Centre made a submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission’s Willing to Work Inquiry into employment discrimination against workers with a disability and older workers. Drawing on clients’ experience, KLC noted the prevalence of disability discrimination and the underreporting of age discrimination. KLC suggested the operation of the law could be improved to prevent discrimination by:
Review of NSW Racial Vilification OffenceDate submitted: 27 November 2015 Submission made to: NSW Attorney General KLC wrote to the NSW Attorney General to welcome her announcement of a review of the NSW Racial Vilification Offence and to provide input into the anticipated exposure draft Bill. Amongst other things, KLC recommended that the offence not be limited to public places and be extended to include religious vilification and extreme racial hate speech. KLC also recommended that amendments be made to other vilification offences and that there be systematic and strategic data collection and monitoring of prejudice-motivated crime. Implementation of the Anti-Social Housing BillDate submitted: 26 October 2015 Submission made to: NSW Minister of Social Housing Along with other community legal centres, KLC wrote to the Housing Minister to express concern about the Residential Tenancies and Housing Legislation Amendment (Public Housing – Antisocial Behaviour) Act 2015 and to seek to be consulted on the implementation of the Act. In particular, KLC expressed concerns about the limitations placed on the Tribunal when considering mandatory evictions and strike notices. KLC welcomed the Minister’s commitment that the new provisions would not apply to ‘innocent tenants’ who have no knowledge of their occupant’s behaviour, and to rehouse vulnerable tenants whose tenancies are terminated. Australian Human Rights Commission: Religious Freedom RoundtableDate submitted: 1 October 2015 Submission made to: Australian Human Rights Commission In this submission to inform the Religious Freedom Roundtable, KLC argues that Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws do not interfere with religious freedom; permanent exemptions in Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws should be replaced by a general limitations clause; and Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws should include religion (including no religion) as a protected attribute ALRC Freedoms Inquiry – Interim ReportDate submitted: 21 September 2015 Submission made to: Australian Law Reform Commission KLC made a follow up submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission on its Freedoms Inquiry Interim Report. KLC reiterated its concern that the framework for “traditional rights and freedoms”, as set out in the Inquiry’s Terms of Reference, excludes other significant rights and freedoms, including the right to be free from discrimination. KLC focused on rights and freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association and burden of proof. Submission to the Productivity Commission Draft Report into the Workplace Relations FrameworkDate submitted: 16 September 2015 Submission made to: Productivity Commission KLC raised concerns about a number of recommendations in the draft report that would have the effect of restricting access to justice. In particular, KLC opposes any increase to lodgement fees and decisions being made ‘on the papers’ in unfair dismissal matters, reductions to penalty rates and changes to the general protections complaint process. KLC recommends that the small business fair dismissal code be removed and that the Fair Work Commission publish a conciliation register and actively seek feedback from parties and their representatives on conciliation experiences. KLC supports increased resourcing of the Fair Work Ombudsman across all matters, including migrant workers. Victims Support Reassessment SchemeDate submitted: 2 September 2015 Submission made to: NSW Attorney General As part of the CLCNSW Victims Support Committee, KLC wrote to the NSW Attorney General about the new Victims Support reassessment process for victims who lodged applications under the old scheme. KLC expressed welcomed the scheme but also expressed some concerns about it. KLC asked the Attorney to consider extending the deadline for making applications, providing discretion to extend time limits on responding to requests for evidence, accepting reassessment applications that were dismissed due to no act of violence being established, ensuring full appeal rights, engaging in a widespread communications strategy and funding legal costs in limited situations. Public Housing Anti-Social Behaviour Bill - Briefing PaperParliament is set to debate new laws that will remove safety net for vulnerable social housing tenants at risk of homelessness. Kingsford Legal Centre worked with EATS, Inner-City Legal Centre, Marrickville Legal Centre and Refern Legal Centre to develop a briefing paper. Joint NGO Submission to the second Universal Periodic Review of AustraliaThis Joint NGO Submission to has been prepared by the Human Rights Law Centre, the Kingsford Legal Centre and the National Association of Community Legal Centres, with substantial contributions from a number of NGOs across Australia and is endorsed, in whole or in part, by 190 NGOs.
Proposed changes to Victims Support schemeDate submitted: 16 July 2015 Submission made to: NSW Attorney General KLC wrote to the NSW Attorney General to welcome proposed changes to the Victims Support scheme so that victims who lodged applications under the previous scheme could have their applications reassessed under that scheme’s provisions. KLC asked the Attorney to consider providing ex-gratia payments, funded legal assistance, no time limits for applicants, and eligibility for withdrawn applications. KLC also expressed its concerns about the current Victims Support scheme, in particular the high requirements for documentary evidence in cases involving domestic violence or sexual assault. Senate Committee: Inquiry into access to legal assistance services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander AustraliansDate submitted: 15 May 2015 Submission made to: Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee KLC submitted that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have limited access to legal services. This results from a lack of awareness about legal issues, disenfranchisement with laws and the legal system, and a lack of adequate and culturally appropriate services. KLC also highlights the importance of justice reinvestment in addressing and preventing high rates of incarceration. Australian Government: Consultation on ICESCR Periodic ReportingDate submitted: 25 May 2015 Submission made to: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Human Rights and Gender Equality Branch) KLC expressed concern about the consultation and reporting process, including concern about the delay in responding to UN human rights treaty bodies, the need to consult on implementation of Concluding Observations and the need to consult more broadly, particularly with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations and social services. KLC recommends that the Australian Report include details of measures adopted to progress ICESCR rights, and difficulties affecting fulfilments of ICESCR obligations. KLC emphasises the need for disaggregated data, indicators and benchmarks to assist in measuring progress in Australia. Submission to Justice Policy Discussion Paper on limitation periods in civil claims for child sexual assaultDate submitted: 23 March 2015 Submission made to: Department of Justice KLC supports the right of survivors of child sexual assault to pursue civil litigation, although in KLC’s experience it is not an effective mechanism for providing redress to survivors. KLC submitted that time limits for making a civil claim again an individual perpetrator or institution in all cases of child sexual assault should be removed, and that consideration should be given to removing the limitation in all cases of sexual assault. KLC also submitted that if a time limit is to remain in place, the “disability exception” to the limitation period should be expanded to include the impacts of sexual abuse including trauma, shame, or fear. KLC also argued that any changes made to the Limitation Act which benefits survivors should be retrospective so that survivors who gave evidence at the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Sexual Abuse could benefit from the amendment. KLC also recommended that any amendments to the Limitations Act be accompanied by improvements to the existing statutory victims compensation scheme and increased funding to services which assist survivors of child sexual assault. Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Workplace Relations FrameworkDate submitted: 13 March 2015 Submission made to: Productivity Commission KLC responded to the Productivity Commission’s Inquiry into Workplace Relations issues papers. The issues KLC raised include:
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Consultation Paper on Redress & Civil LitigationDate submitted: 9 March 2015 Submission made to: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Consultation Paper on Redress and Civil Litigation KLC argued that it supports the creation of a national and uniform redress scheme as this will generally provide a better alternative to civil litigation. KLC submitted that any redress scheme established must be survivor led, and should include counselling and psychological care as a component of redress. KLC argued that it should be a fundamental requirement of any redress scheme that survivors are not re-traumatised by making them jump through unnecessary legal hoops. In relation to civil litigation, time limits in all cases of child sexual assault should be removed across Australia. Laws, including on vicarious liability, need to be reformed to prevent institutions blocking litigation and hiding their assets. KLC also argued that Non-Government, as well as Government, institutions should adopt model litigant principles. Social Housing in NSW Discussion paperWe responded to the Social Housing Discussion Paper about the future of social housing in NSW. In its Discussion Paper, the NSW Government raised concerns about the long waitlists, properties not meeting tenants’ needs because of size, location, modifications and access, tenants of working age staying in public housing for a long time, and the costs of providing and maintaining housing.
On 5 February 2015 KLC held a forum for social housing tenants at the Kooloora Community Centre. The response well exceeded our expectations with over 40 social housing tenants attended the forum. We gave a brief presentation on the Discussion Paper and how the submission process works. In particular we offered participants choice in how they could respond. Participants had the choice of an:
We offered this choice because not all social housing tenants feel comfortable using a computer and/or they struggle to express themselves in writing. We also believe it is important the NSW Government see and hear directly from social housing tenants. We developed a series of resources to help participants at the forum understand the contents of the Discussion Paper and the questions asked of them. At the forum 3 staff and 5 law students assisted participants to make 10 video, 2 online and 4 handwritten submissions. These were sent directly to the NSW Government as separate submissions. We obtained permission from many of the participants to use their stories in our own submission. In our submission, we said that the NSW Government needs to improve their consultation processes to make them more accessible to tenants, and to support tenants’ understanding and involvement in the process. We also said that we recognise there are significant problems with the availability and maintenance of social housing. However, we pointed out that a different framework is needed for considering this. We said greater independence for tenants could be achieved through providing holistic, community based services. And we submitted that a fair social housing system gives priority and additional support to the most vulnerable tenants. Adequate funding is essential in creating a sustainable social housing system. ALRC Freedoms InquiryDate submitted: 21 September 2015 Submission made to: Australian Law Reform Commission KLC made a submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission Freedoms Inquiry. KLC expressed its concern that the framework for “traditional rights and freedoms”, as set out in the Inquiry’s Terms of Reference, excludes other significant rights and freedoms, including the right to be free from discrimination. KLC also expressed our support for the enactment of a national Human Rights Act to address insufficient protections of rights and freedoms at the Commonwealth level. KLC focused on rights and freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association and burden of proof. NSW Disability Inclusion Plan ConsultationDate submitted: 5 January 2015 Submission made to: Department of Family and Community Services The NSW Government is consulting on the creation of a NSW Disability Inclusion Plan which sets the direction for significant reforms to laws, policies, practices and procedures which affect people living with disability. KLC made recommendations in the area of social housing and education. KLC recommends that the NSW Government increase the availability of public housing for people with disability and that Housing NSW work closely with services that support social housing tenants to ensure they can maintain their tenancies. KLC advocated for better training for teachers and school staff in how to make schools more supportive and accessible for students with disability. KLC argues that students with disability and their parents should not have to resort to discrimination law to enforce their rights at school. 2014Australian Human Rights Commission’s 2014 Rights & Responsibilities ConsultationWe argue for stronger rights protection in Australian law, including through a Human Rights Act and stronger discrimination laws. We express our concern about the freedom of speech implications of recent changes to community legal centre funding agreements, and about the freedom of association implications of the NSW consorting offence. We voice our support for protections for freedom of association in employment, and the existing racial discrimination laws. UN Special Rapporteur on Adequate HousingKLC submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, who is looking into the responsibilities of sub-national governments with respect to the right to adequate housing Inquiry into Tenancy Management in Social HousingKLC believes that the Housing NSW policy in providing and maintaining public housing does not adequately take into account the tenant’s circumstances. In our experience, it serves to entrench discrimination and disadvantage against people with extremely complex needs. We feel that there has been no associated service strategy to assist in the provision of housing to this group. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse on Issues Paper 6- redress schemesKLC argues that traditional legal and court processes do not deliver satisfactory results for survivors. Survivor-designed redress schemes can provide the best opportunity for healing outcomes and wider benefits to the community. Amendments to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975KLC believes that the RDA has found an appropriate balance between the right to freedom of speech and right to freedom from racial vilification and should not be amended. If the Government wants to better protect freedom of speech we recommend including the right to freedom of speech in the Australian Constitution or a national human rights act. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (the Commission) on Issues Paper 5 - Civil Litigation.In KLC’s view there is currently no civil litigation model in Australia equipped to deal with the complex issues and experiences of survivors. The overwhelming response to the Royal Commission in itself reveals that justice for survivors has not been achieved through current legal approaches. KLC is strongly of the opinion that the Commission should recommend funding for victims’ survivors groups with the aim of developing survivor redress schemes. Parliamentary Commission: Inquiry into social, public and affordable housingThe right to safe, secure and affordable housing is a human right which KLC believes should be enshrined in domestic legislation. There should be an emphasis on anti-discrimination. Furthermore, ensuring public housing stock is maintained in a reasonable state of cleanliness and fit for habitation is important. NSW ombudsman: Submission for legislative review of the consorting provisionsKLC does not believe that the consorting provisions are necessary. The consorting provisions should be repealed. This is due to their value to combat organised crime being outweighed by the detrimental impact when used against vulnerable and disadvantaged people who are not necessarily involved in organised crime. Australian Human Rights Commission: Submission on the Pregnancy and Return to Work National ReviewKLC recognises that systemic discrimination against pregnant employees and parents seeking to take parental leave continues to occur. This type of discrimination has vast and serious cost implications for the Australian economy. Solutions should include education campaign and resources on pregnancy and pregnancy-related rights of employees targeting employers, as well as, replacing existing definitions of direct and indirect discrimination with a unified definition of discrimination. 2013Criminal Law Review: Crimes Amendment (Provocation) Bill 2013KLC is pleased that the Bill seeks to amend the partial defence of provocation because in its current form the defence can perpetuate and entrench violence against women and gay men. However, it is concerning that the amended partial defence will continue to allow men to assert the defence, when they kill their partners out of jealousy and a need for control. Further, the proposed amendment will still make it very difficult for some victims of domestic violence who kill their violent partners, to make use of this partial defence. Access to Justice: Submission on Access to Justice Arrangements InquiryTo establish the greatest benefit in providing access to justice, KLC believes that there needs to be an emphasis on community education about the civil dispute resolution system and places they can go for help with their civil dispute. The potential benefits from being able address the issues early in a dispute are many and varied, including avoiding unnecessary significant costs and mental anguish. Particularly for discrimination matters, the current federal framework is complex and creates significant barriers to access to justice. Community Legal Centres (CLCs) provide a central role in providing access to justice in not just in providing legal advice, but also in community development and law reform. Anti-Discrimination Amendment (Private Educational Authorities) Bill 2013KLC supports the removal of exceptions in the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), which allow private educational authorities to discriminate against students on the basis of their sex, homosexuality, transgender status, marital or domestic status, disability and age. Further, KLC believes that section 56(d) of the Act should also be removed. This section allows religious organisations to discriminate when they deem it necessary to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of their adherents. It Stops Here: Standing together to end domestic and family violence reformsKLC believes that education and early intervention program forms the required backbone to drive change in domestic and family violence reforms. Education about healthy relationships and the dynamics of DV/FV should form part of all primary and high school curriculums, and should be delivered in a culturally sensitive and inclusive way. Early invention programs should be available to families at risk of violence. Driver Licence Disqualification Reform (Inquiry)KLC support reforms giving offenders the right to apply to court to have their outstanding disqualification period removed after completing a minimum offence free period. Further, the Habitual Offenders Scheme should be abolished because it has little impact on recidivism and often leads to re-offending. Finally, we submit that courts should have absolute discretion to impose appropriate disqualification periods or alternative penalties. Impact of Federal Court Fee Increases since 2010 on Access to Justice in AustraliaKLC does not support the recent increase of federal court fees. The increase of the court fees in 2013, while it may appear justified from a budgetary perspective impedes access to the justice system for those with financial difficulties. Increased court fees should not limit access to justice for low income people. Impact of the Cost of Transcripts on Access to Justice in NSWIn our experience the costs associated with obtaining transcripts of court and tribunal proceedings in NSW can act as a barrier to individuals accessing justice. Fees for transcripts should be reduced and fee waivers made available for socio-economically disadvantaged people. Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules and Commentary- Consultation with Legal Assistance Services Peak BodiesKLC has long been concerned about how some of the ethical duties of solicitors are understood and applied in our type of legal practice, a community legal centre (CLC). KLC believes that CLCs should have its own definition to clarify application of the conflict rules for “one-off advice” situations. Additionally, Rule 4.1.1 should include a reference to advising a client of the availability of community legal services in appropriate services. Other issues applicable to CLCs are the confidentiality (rule 9) as well as managing conflicts of duties (rules 10 and 11). Sex Discrimination Act (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013KLC welcomes the amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA) as an interim measure to provide LGTBI persons with protections from discrimination under federal law. We believe that SDA will benefit from protection on costs and intersectional discrimination along with a shared burden of proof. Specific United Nations Human Rights instruments should be relied for the insertion of the protection of sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status. There are also various recommended amendments to existing statutes. 2012Inquiry into the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012- Exposure Draft LegislationNACLC and KLC welcome the Government’s decision to consolidate Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws. The Exposure Draft Legislation provides a number of measures that will enhance discrimination protections in Australia, and promote the implementation of our international human rights into domestic law, and promote substantive equality. However we have concerns that the operation of the Act will not fulfill the objects clause in relation to addressing substantive equality, and make a number of recommendations aimed at strengthening the Draft in this regard. Right to Silence Laws in NSWKLC opposes the proposed changes to the right to silence in the Evidence Amendment (Evidence of Silence) Bill 2012. We are opposed to these changes because they would erode the right of the accused to a fair trial, are not based on any empirical-based research, do not have the appropriate safeguards for vulnerable people, and will not be combined with adequate legal representation. Draft National Human Rights Action PlanKLC supports many of the specific priorities in the Action Plan, but is concerned that the Action provides no wider policy goals. We are concerned that presently the priorities outlined in the Action Plan are simply the listing of specific projects, rather than broader Commonwealth strategies to achieve human rights. We believe that the Action Plan must include wider national policy goals, as well as specific projects. KLC endorses the National Association of Community Legal Centres (NACLC) submission on the Exposure Draft of Australia’s National Human Rights Action Plan. Review of NSW’s Victims Compensation SchemeKLC believes that the current Scheme is inadequate in creating an effective and efficient system for victims’ compensation. KLC has numerous recommendations to improve the system, including dedicating sufficient resources to the Victims Compensation Tribunal, higher level of compensation for victims of multiple acts of violence, etc. Submission to the Review of the Fair Work Act 2009KLC believes that the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides increased protection for employees and has improved the position of employees in Australia. We urge the Government to make a stronger commitment to increasing the flexibility of Australian workplaces by creating enforceable rights to flexible working arrangements and placing positive obligations on employer to create flexible workplaces. NACLC’s Response to the Consolidation of Commonwealth Anti-Discrimination Laws Discussion PaperNACLC believes that Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws need to be enhanced to enshrine Australia’s international human rights obligations into domestic law and to promote substantive equality. The paper explains numerous recommendations to improve the Australia’s anti-discussion paper. KLC coordinated this submission for NACLC. |
